Capstone Bible
  1. Library
  2. Topics
  3. Nathan-Melech Bulla

A Seventh-Century Bulla Naming an Official of Josiah's Court

Nathan-Melech Bulla

Also called Eved Hamelech Bulla

A clay seal impression from the City of David reading "belonging to Nathan-Melech, servant of the king" — a rare name, the right century, and a royal title, held together without a patronymic on either side.

Object
Aniconic clay bulla in two registers
Found at
A First Temple period administrative building in the Givati Parking Lot excavation, City of David, Jerusalem
Found in
October 2018; announced March 2019
Found by
The Givati Parking Lot excavation, directed by Yuval Gadot (Tel Aviv University) and Yiftah Shalev (Israel Antiquities Authority); read and published by Anat Mendel-Geberovich. No individual finder is recorded
Dates from
Mid-seventh to early sixth century BC per the excavation's epigrapher; C. Rollston narrows it to c. 675-625 BC and doubts the later end. The building was destroyed in 586 BC
Now held at
Israel Antiquities Authority

An Administrative Building, and a Careful Announcement

The bulla was found in October 2018 in the Givati Parking Lot excavation in the City of David, a dig run jointly by Tel Aviv University and the Israel Antiquities Authority under Yuval Gadot and Yiftah Shalev. Its context is a large public building of the First Temple period, built of finely cut ashlar with a polished plaster floor, and buried under stone debris, burnt beams and charred pottery from the Babylonian destruction of 586 BC. Press coverage of two long-serving team members, Sveta Pnik and Ayyala Rodan, credits them with the find of the bulla and of a companion agate seal, though the accounts differ on which of them found which. The epigrapher who read and published it is Anat Mendel-Geberovich.

The reading is not in dispute, which in this section is worth saying out loud. Two registers, every letter clear: lntnmlk, "belonging to Nathan-Melech," and ʿbd hmlk, "servant of the king." There is no imagery — an aniconic seal, the normal Judahite style after the eighth century. C. Rollston, who dates the script to roughly 675-625 BC on the shapes of the nun, lamed and kaf, went out of his way to praise the excavators and the epigrapher for the sobriety of their public statements, calling it a model for the field.

Servant of the King

The title is the interesting half. ʿbd hmlk does not mean "slave of the king" in this usage; it is the designation of a senior royal official, and it is well attested. A seal from Tomb 19 at Tell en-Nasbeh reads "belonging to Yaʾazanyahu, servant of the king." Lachish Ostracon 3 refers to a Tobiyahu, servant of the king. The Megiddo seal in this section names Shema as servant of Jeroboam, using the same formula with the king's own name in place of the title. So the bulla is not a private signet; it is the working seal of a man near the top of Judah's administration, found in the building where such men worked.

The name itself is the rarest thing about it. Nathan-Melech means "the King has given," with "King" functioning as a way of referring to God, exactly as other Judahite names of the same shape use El or the divine name instead. In the whole Hebrew Bible it belongs to exactly one person: the official at whose chamber Josiah found the horses that the kings of Judah had dedicated to the sun, in 2 Kings 23:11. That is a single attestation, in the reign of a king whose dates sit squarely inside the palaeographic range of the script.

How Much Weight the Match Will Take

Four things converge here and it is worth naming them separately, because the strength of the case is exactly the sum of them and no more. The name is rare rather than common. The date of the script matches the reign of Josiah. The archaeological context is a royal administrative building in Jerusalem. And both the biblical figure and the seal's owner carry a royal title. Rollston's own assessment is that this makes it probable, indeed most likely, that they are the same man — and that is the assessment this app follows.

But the identification is not certain, and Rollston says why in the same breath. Neither the Bible nor the bulla supplies a patronymic, which is the ordinary way an ancient identification is nailed down. And the two titles are not actually the same word: 2 Kings 23:11 calls the biblical Nathan-Melech a saris — a royal attendant, or possibly a eunuch — while the bulla says servant of the king. It is entirely reasonable that one man held or rose to both, and equally possible that the seal belonged to a son or grandson of the same name, since Judahite families reused names across generations. Certitude, as Rollston puts it, remains just beyond reach.

The people who found it said the same thing in their own words at the time. Mendel-Geberovich's published statement was that it is not possible to determine with complete certainty that the Nathan-Melech of the Bible owned the seal, and that it is equally impossible to ignore the details linking them. She also made an argument in the object's favour that is easy to miss: the man is named without any lineage at all, which suggests he was well enough known that nobody needed it.

The honest form of the claim, then, is this: a high official of Josiah's Jerusalem, bearing a name attested only once in Scripture, sealed documents in a building that burned when the city fell — and he is very probably the man of 2 Kings 23:11. Not certainly. Very probably. That distinction is not pedantry; it is the difference between a claim that survives contact with an epigrapher and one that does not.

Scripture references

Sources

Further reading

Reflect

Nathan-Melech appears in one verse of the Bible, as a room next to a gate. What would it mean to be faithful in a role nobody will remember the details of?

More topics

Capstone Bible is a free interactive study app — a map of every place in this library, a zoomable timeline of biblical and church history, the Bible text with every name in it linked to its article, reading plans and personal notes.

Open Capstone Bible