Capstone Bible
  1. Library
  2. Topics
  3. War Scroll

A Battle Order for the Last War, Qumran Cave 1

War Scroll

Also called The War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness

Nineteen columns setting out how the Sons of Light will fight the Sons of Darkness at the end of the age — battle arrays, weaponry, formations and the ages of the men, written like a military manual for a war nobody fought.

Siglum
1QM (1Q33)
Type
Parchment scroll, nineteen columns, 279 cm long and 15-16 cm high
Language
Hebrew, in a square Herodian script
Contents
A rule for the final war between the Sons of Light and the Sons of Darkness: the seven engagements, the battle arrays, the weaponry, the ages of the combatants, the manoeuvres, and the priests' leadership. Nineteen columns survive of at least twenty, and the foot of every column is lost
Written
Late first century BC or early first century AD Traditional dating
Origin
Judea
Found at
Qumran, Cave 1
Found in
1947
Found by
Bedouin of the Ta'amireh tribe; bought from the dealer Salahi by E. L. Sukenik for the Hebrew University
Now held at
The Shrine of the Book, Israel Museum, Jerusalem
Shelfmark
96.84/210
Facsimile
View the manuscript

A Manual for a Battle at the End of the Age

The War Scroll is one of the seven scrolls from Cave 1, and one of the three that E. L. Sukenik of the Hebrew University bought from the Bethlehem dealer Salahi rather than from Kando. It is 279 centimetres long and unusually short in height, between 15 and 16 centimetres, and carries nineteen columns; there were at least twenty originally, and the lower part of every column is lost. Sukenik published selections almost immediately, and the full plates in 1955. It is in the Shrine of the Book under accession 96.84/210.

What it contains is not a prophecy in the biblical sense but something closer to a staff manual. It sets out a war in seven engagements between the Sons of Light — the community's name for itself — and the Sons of Darkness, who are everyone else, Jew and Gentile alike, led by Belial and assisted by a nation called the Kittim. The confrontation is to run forty-nine years and end with the restoration of the Temple service. Around that frame the scroll specifies battle arrays, weaponry, the ages of the participants and the manoeuvres, in a way that recalls the Hellenistic and Roman military handbooks of the period.

Why a New Testament Reader Recognises It

Sons of light and sons of darkness, a prince of light who is also named Michael, a final conflict between heavenly and earthly forces, a decisive intervention that ends the present age: a reader who comes to this scroll from the New Testament will find the furniture familiar. The Israel Museum's own note observes that it "sheds light on the New Testament Book of Revelation, in which a final war is also described between earthly and heavenly forces." What that shows is worth stating carefully. It is not that Revelation borrowed from this scroll, and not that this community influenced the church. It is that the imagery and the vocabulary of a last battle were already Jewish and already current before the New Testament was written.

The differences are as instructive as the overlaps, and they run deep. The Israel Museum, describing the scroll, says it "lacks a 'messianic' figure" — the museum's reading of the text, given here as that rather than as a settled verdict of the field. What is plain on the surface of it is that the fighting is done by armed Israelites under priests, in formations, with weapons whose dimensions are specified. The language of Ephesians 6, where the armour is truth and righteousness and faith and the wrestling is not against flesh and blood, is doing something else entirely. The two texts share a set of images and disagree about the war.

A War That Never Happened

The obvious question is whether the Kittim are the Romans. The Israel Museum will only write "(Romans?)", and it is right to hedge, because the way the question is now asked has changed. Rather than choosing between Rome and the Seleucids for the whole scroll, recent work reads it as layered. P. R. Davies argued in 1977 that columns 2 to 9 come from the Hasmonean period while the final shape of columns 15 to 19 points to a Roman date; Brian Schultz has argued similarly that columns 1 to 9 are the older Hellenistic core and 10 to 19 a later addition made under Roman rule. On that reading the scroll is not one author's answer to one enemy but a text that kept being rewritten as the enemy changed. There is a second uncertainty of the same kind: seven further manuscripts from Cave 4 carry similar contents, and the Israel Museum's note says the relationship "is not entirely clear" — they may be an earlier version of this scroll, or material it drew on.

The larger caution is about what kind of document this is. It is tempting to read it as a first-century Jewish prediction of a real war, and to line it up with the revolt that broke out in AD 66 and destroyed the Temple. The scroll itself argues against that reading. As the Israel Museum's note puts it, the work "is not, strictly speaking, an apocalypse" — no heaven is opened, nothing is revealed — and it "lacks a 'messianic' figure"; details such as "the advanced age of the combatants and the leadership of the priests, point to the idealistic nature of the war described in the work and impart a fictional quality to the treatise." It may well reflect the real political pressure that produced the revolt. It is not a forecast of it, and no battle of the sort it describes was ever fought.

Scripture references

Sources

Further reading

Reflect

These men drew up formations for a battle that never came. What are you preparing for that may never arrive, and what does the preparing do to you?

More topics

Capstone Bible is a free interactive study app — a map of every place in this library, a zoomable timeline of biblical and church history, the Bible text with every name in it linked to its article, reading plans and personal notes.

Open Capstone Bible