Egyptian Diplomatic Archive, Fourteenth Century BC
Amarna Letters
Also called Amarna tablets, Tell el-Amarna letters, el-Amarna letters No excavation context
Around 380 clay tablets from the abandoned Egyptian capital at Amarna — the incoming diplomatic mail of two pharaohs, and the closest thing we have to a live picture of Canaan in the century or so before Israel appears there.
- Object
- Around 380 clay tablets in Akkadian cuneiform — an archive of incoming diplomatic correspondence
- Found at
- Tell el-Amarna (ancient Akhetaten), Middle Egypt
- Found in
- c. 1887
- Found by
- Local villagers, who sold the tablets on to dealers. The familiar story of a single peasant woman digging for fertiliser is traditional and unverifiable — every account of it is secondhand and they contradict one another
- Dates from
- Fourteenth century BC, in the reigns of Amenhotep III and Akhenaten
- Now held at
- Divided between the Vorderasiatisches Museum in Berlin, the British Museum, the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, the Louvre and other collections
A Pharaoh's In-Tray
Around 1887 local villagers digging in the ruins of Akhetaten — the short-lived capital built by Akhenaten in Middle Egypt, now Tell el-Amarna — turned up inscribed clay tablets. The story usually told, of a single peasant woman digging for fertiliser who stumbled on the pharaoh's archive, is traditional rather than documented: every version of it is secondhand and they contradict one another. What is certain is that the tablets surfaced through villagers and passed into the hands of dealers, so that the archive was scattered and some of it destroyed before scholars reached it. Nearly four hundred were eventually recovered, most of them letters received by the Egyptian court under Amenhotep III and his son Akhenaten in the fourteenth century BC. They are written not in Egyptian but in Akkadian, the diplomatic language of the whole Near East at the time, on clay, in cuneiform, by scribes in Canaan and Syria writing to Egypt in a language native to neither.
Some are correspondence between great kings — Babylon, Assyria, Mitanni, the Hittites — trading gold, marriage alliances, and elaborate courtesy. The larger group is from the rulers of the small city-states of Canaan, who were Egyptian vassals. These are less dignified. They plead for troops, denounce their neighbours as traitors, complain that previous letters have gone unanswered, and protest their own loyalty at length.
Canaan Before Israel
This is the archive's real value for Bible readers. It shows Canaan as a patchwork of small, fortified, quarrelsome city-states — Jerusalem, Shechem, Megiddo, Gezer, Lachish, Hazor and dozens more — under loose Egyptian overlordship, each with its own ruler, none able to dominate the others, all of them appealing to a distant pharaoh who mostly did nothing. That is recognisably the political landscape the books of Joshua and Judges describe, minus Israel.
The letters from Abdi-Heba, the ruler of Jerusalem, are among the earliest written references to the city — six letters begging Egypt for archers and warning that the land is being lost. Shechem appears under a ruler named Labaya, who is repeatedly accused of carving out territory for himself. A reader who wants a sense of what a Canaanite city-state was and how it behaved will find it here rather than in any monument.
The Habiru Question
Many of the letters complain about the 'Apiru or Habiru, groups outside the settled order who raid, take service as mercenaries, and shelter runaways. When the tablets were first read, the resemblance between Habiru and Hebrew was electrifying, and for decades the Amarna letters were presented as an outside witness to Israel's arrival in Canaan.
That identification has largely been abandoned, and for good reasons. Habiru turns up across the Near East for the better part of a thousand years, from Mesopotamia to Anatolia to Egypt, referring to people of varied origins; it describes a social and legal status — displaced, stateless, outside the city system — rather than an ethnic group. The Amarna Habiru are used by Canaanite rulers as an insult for rivals as much as a description of outsiders. A linguistic relationship between the words is possible and is still argued by some scholars; an equation between the Habiru of these letters and the Israelites of the Bible is not supportable, and should not be offered as though it were.
Scripture references
- Joshua 10:1-5 — A coalition of Canaanite city-state kings, including Jerusalem
- Joshua 12:7-24 — The list of defeated kings — one per city, exactly the Amarna pattern
- Judges 1:27-36 — Canaanite cities Israel did not take
- Genesis 34:1-31 — Shechem, whose Amarna-era ruler Labaya troubled his neighbours
Sources
- Holding institutionStaatliche Museen zu Berlin: Vorderasiatisches Museum — Staatliche Museen zu Berlin · The museum holding the largest share of the Amarna correspondenceSupports: Where the bulk of the archive is held today
- ScholarshipWilliam L. Moran, The Amarna Letters — William L. Moran · Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992 — the standard English edition and translation of the whole corpus. Print onlySupports: The content of the letters, including Abdi-Heba's letters from Jerusalem and the 'Apiru complaints
- ReferenceBible Odyssey (SBL): Jerusalem in the Amarna Letters — Society of Biblical LiteratureSupports: Abdi-Heba's letters and what they show about fourteenth-century Jerusalem
- EncyclopediaWikipedia: Amarna letters
Further reading
More topics
Capstone Bible is a free interactive study app — a map of every place in this library, a zoomable timeline of biblical and church history, the Bible text with every name in it linked to its article, reading plans and personal notes.
Open Capstone Bible