Capstone Bible
  1. Library
  2. Topics
  3. Nimrud Ivories

Assyrian Furniture Inlays, 9th-8th Century BC

Nimrud Ivories

Also called Nimrud ivory carvings

More than six thousand carved ivory panels, plaques and harness fittings dug out of the Assyrian capital at Nimrud - thrones, beds and chairs stripped of their gold and stacked in storerooms. They are what the Bible means by a house of ivory.

Object
Carved elephant and hippopotamus ivory - furniture panels, plaques, boxes, horse blinkers and harness ornaments, some inlaid with coloured glass and semi-precious stone or gilded, in Phoenician, North Syrian and Assyrian styles
Found at
Nimrud (ancient Kalhu), northern Iraq - the Northwest Palace, Fort Shalmaneser, the Burnt Palace, the temple of Nabu and the Town Wall Houses
Found in
1845 onward (Layard and Loftus); 1949-1963 (British School of Archaeology in Iraq); further finds by Iraqi and Italian teams in the 1970s, 1987-89 and 1992
Found by
Many hands over 150 years. Austen Henry Layard from 1845 and William Kennett Loftus in the 1850s; Max Mallowan and then David Oates for the British School of Archaeology in Iraq from 1949; Said al-Iraqi in the 1970s, Paolo Fiorina's Italian team in 1987-89 and Muzahim Mahmoud in 1992
Dates from
Ninth and eighth centuries BC, deposited before the sack of the city in the late seventh century Traditional dating
Now held at
Divided and, in part, unaccounted for. The largest holding is the Iraq Museum in Baghdad, which reopened a refurbished ivories gallery in 2015; others are in the British Museum, the Ashmolean Museum and the Metropolitan Museum of Art, with smaller groups in a dozen or so museums that sponsored the excavation. The British Institute for the Study of Iraq sold and donated most of its holding to the British Museum in 2011 and retains a selection for eventual return to Iraq. Losses from the 1991 uprising and the 2003 war have never been fully accounted for

Two Excavations, A Century Apart

A. H. Layard began finding ivory at Nimrud on his second day of work in 1845, in rooms A, V and W of the Northwest Palace - the same campaigns that produced the Black Obelisk. W. K. Loftus turned up more in the Central Palace and the Burnt Palace in the 1850s. Then the site went quiet for most of a century. M. Mallowan and his team, digging for the British School of Archaeology in Iraq in the 1940s and 1950s, found large quantities in the Northwest Palace wells and at Nabu's temple and the Town Wall Houses; D. Oates's team pulled literally thousands of pieces out of Fort Shalmaneser in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Iraqi archaeologists added more - S. al-Iraqi in Well AJ in the mid-1970s and M. Mahmoud in a newly excavated well in 1992 - and P. Fiorina's Italian team recovered nearly 1,500 further fragments in 1987-89. Counting fragments, the total runs past six thousand pieces; something over a thousand of them are substantial.

What they are is furniture. Chair and bed panels, plaques, boxes, horse blinkers and harness ornaments, carved in Phoenician, North Syrian and Assyrian styles, some inlaid with coloured glass and semi-precious stone or highlighted with gold leaf, and assembled with tiny alphabetic fitters' marks in inconspicuous places so the pieces could be put together in the right order. Most of it had never been used. Stripped of its gold and stacked in storerooms in the Northwest Palace and in Fort Shalmaneser, it lay untouched for decades and in some cases centuries before the sack of the city in the late seventh century BC scattered it into wells and burnt rooms.

One name attaches to these objects above all others, and the reason is worth knowing. Mallowan's wife, the novelist A. Christie, went out with the expedition every year, registered finds, typed the field catalogue, took and developed photographs, and cleaned some of the ivories - by her own account with an orange stick, a fine knitting needle, a dentist's tool and a jar of cosmetic face-cream, which she found better than anything else for coaxing dirt out of the crevices. The excavation project's own historians note that she was in fact given only a small number of objects, that her failing eyesight meant the delicate work later went to professional conservators, and that Mallowan used his wife's fame to attract sponsors, who were then given ivories from the excavators' share.

Ahab's House Of Ivory

"Now the rest of the acts of Ahab, and all that he did, and the ivory house which he built." "The houses of ivory will perish." "Who lie on beds of ivory, and stretch themselves on their couches." "Out of ivory palaces stringed instruments have made you glad." The phrases are familiar and they are usually read as poetry. They are not poetry. They are descriptions of a class of object, and the Nimrud material is that object by the thousand.

Nobody ever built a house out of ivory. What the phrase describes is furniture and panelling faced with carved ivory inlay - the beds Amos names, the thrones and chairs, the boxes, the wall fittings. Solomon's great ivory throne overlaid with gold in 1 Kings 10:18 is an object of exactly this kind, and after Nimrud we know what one looked like from the inside, down to the fitters' marks.

Assyria's own kings say where it came from. Ashurnasirpal II lists among the tribute he took from Ahunu of Bit-Adini "ivory dishes, ivory couches, ivory chests, ivory thrones decorated with silver and gold," and among the tribute of Tyre, Sidon, Byblos and Arwad, ebony and hippopotamus ivory. His son Shalmaneser III records ivory from Babylonia and from Suhu. The craftsmen were in the small independent kingdoms of the Phoenician coast; the raw material came up from Egypt and Nubia; and the finished goods moved east as tribute and loot. The kingdoms of Israel and Judah sat inside that same world - the Black Obelisk, dug out of this same mound, records Jehu's tribute going the same direction as the ivory.

What The Ivories Do And Do Not Show

Start with what is solid, because it is unusually solid. Amos was describing real objects, and we can hold them. The prophets' vocabulary of luxury - houses of ivory, beds of ivory - is not metaphor and not exaggeration, and the discovery of six thousand pieces of exactly the furniture the phrase names is a straightforward recovery of what an eighth-century audience would have pictured. That much should be said without hedging.

Now the limit. The Nimrud ivories are not Ahab's. They were carved in Phoenicia and Syria, they reached Assyria as tribute and plunder, and not one of them can be traced to Samaria. They tell us what the phrase meant; they do not touch the king the phrase is attached to.

The ivories that were found in Israel's own capital are a separate assemblage, and their date is argued. Excavations at Samaria between 1908 and 1935 produced more than twelve thousand ivory items from near the palace, carved in the same Phoenician manner. They were originally assigned to the ninth century largely because of the assumed connection to Ahab's ivory house; the range given for them now is the ninth to the eighth century, and many specialists prefer the eighth - which would put them a century after Ahab and much closer to Amos. So the object that most directly illustrates 1 Kings 22:39 may in fact be illustrating Amos 3:15 instead. That is a small correction, and it matters, because the popular version - archaeologists found Ahab's ivory house - is not what happened, and the true version is the better story anyway: a small Levantine kingdom buying Phoenician luxury goods, exactly as 1 Kings and Amos assume, with a prophet furious about it.

The last limit is a modern one. Until Iraqi law changed in 1968, foreign expeditions kept a share of what they dug, and the British School's share was distributed to a dozen or so sponsoring museums and universities, where isolated groups of a few pieces have sometimes sat in storage ever since. The much larger share retained in Iraq was distributed to provincial museums as well as Baghdad, and has been looted or damaged three times in thirty-five years: in the 1991 uprising, when over two thousand museum objects were stolen or destroyed; after the 2003 war, when the Iraq Museum and provincial museums were attacked and a bank vault flooded, waterlogging ivories and other antiquities; and from 2014, when the site of Nimrud itself fell under the control of ISIS. The project that has spent decades reuniting these objects for publication states it plainly: there is still no definitive account of what was lost.

Scripture references

Sources

Reflect

Amos was not angry that Israel had beautiful things. He was angry that they lay on ivory beds while the needy were sold for a pair of shoes. Where does that line fall in your own life?

More topics

Capstone Bible is a free interactive study app — a map of every place in this library, a zoomable timeline of biblical and church history, the Bible text with every name in it linked to its article, reading plans and personal notes.

Open Capstone Bible